![]() But in terms of sound, the E10 has a better tonal balance and does not come with the sibilance that the S2 has.īut if you absolutely have to spend $50 on a TWS set (possibly cheaper on the street), the S2 is an adequate pick. Now the ergonomics are different between the two of course the E10 has those odd ear hooks that some have complained about, while the S2 is a more traditional “bud”-type fit that should work for more people. Unfortunately the existence of the S2 in KZ’s lineup seems like a mystery, especially when you can get their very own E10 for just $10 more. Unfortunately the S2 strays into sibilance, a flaw that is arguably its biggest sonic dealbreaker, but overall there’s nothing too offensive about the S2’s sound, tonally or technically. The S2 has a mainstream house elevated bass and treble for an exciting V-shaped response, though the shape of the V is slightly biased towards the treble. The S2’s sound quality does not impress and neither does its plasticky build quality, but for $50 you don’t have much grounds for complaining. ![]() ![]() The name of the S2’s game seems to be “adequate performance for bottom-dollar price”, and to that I think KZ has done it. Sennheiser Momentum True Wireless: “Carried by Name”Īll awarded grades are in reference to the IEM ranking list. Samsung Galaxy Buds+: “Objectivist’s Dream” ![]() Anker Soundcore Liberty 2 Pro: “That Linus TWS”Īudio Technica ATH-CK3TW: “The Imbalanced”Īudio Technica ATH-CKS5TW: “Acoustically Challenged”Īudio Technica ATH-SPORT7TW: “Combo Breaker” ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |